SIGNAL GRIDv0.1

Show HN: Open-weight OCR got so cheap I had to share it

1 sources1 storiesFirst seen 7/24/2026Score14Mixed Progress
Single Source
CoverageRecencyEngagementVelocityBignessConfidenceClipability
Bigness
14
Coverage
13
Recency
37
Engagement
7
Velocity
0
Confidence
49
Clipability
60
Polarization
0
Claims
5
Contradictions
0
Breakthrough
50

Sentiment Mix

Positive0%
Neutral100%
Negative0%

Geography

North America

Expert Signals

TimurKramar

author1 mention

Hacker News

source1 mention

AI-Generated Claims

Generated from linked receipts; click sources for full context.

This was not supposed to become a product.When PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 dropped, independent benchmarks put it at the top of document parsing models.

Supported by 1 story

I assumed that even after getting it running, serving a vision-language model would be expensive.It turns out the opposite is true.

Supported by 1 story

Once I had it running properly, the cost was absurdly low.

Supported by 1 story

At proper GPU utilization, the cost is only around $1 per 1,000 pages.The nearest competitors are either much lower quality (Azure Read) or absurdly expensive (Extend or Reducto).

Supported by 1 story

Even Mistral OCR 4 which is really good and pretty cheap is still 4x more expensive.So I had to share it.

Supported by 1 story

Related Events

Timeline (1 stories)

Jul 25 12:12 PMFirst
Show HN: Open-weight OCR got so cheap I had to share it
Hacker News21 engagement

Receipts (1)

Bias Snapshot

Center
Left 0%Center 100%Right 0%
Aggopenparser.dev7/24/2026